I couldn't help myself writing this as i stumble across a Facebook posting.
Long before I even got into the
corporate game, I’d always heard people say “there’s no such thing as bad publicity.” The theory is that as long as people are talking about you, it’s a good thing.
Even if they’re saying awful things about you or your company, the publicity is
supposed to still be good because your name is on the top of people’s minds,
keeping you relevant.
And in some cases, this is true. Just the other day, we talked about how
Kanye West is the king of controversy. The hip hop superstar seems to always be
on the receiving end of negative media coverage, but in his case, it’s actually
served to help his career. It seems like the more negative attention he gets,
the more people buy his albums. In short, he thrives on the “bad publicity.”
But Kanye is the
exception, not the rule. The idea that there’s no such thing as bad publicity
is laughable. It’s totally insane.
Just ask BP. Do you think they enjoyed being in the spotlight for the disastrous
oil spill in the Gulf? Do you think they enjoyed having people boycott their fueling stations? Do you think they thought it was cool
that there was a BP oil spill Halloween costume?
Of course they
didn't. The company took a massive hit thanks to all of the negative publicity.
They've already spent millions trying to rebuild their image through a PPC campaign, TV commercials, and more.
And what about
Toyota? How do you think all of those recalls over faulty, dangerous vehicles
worked out for them? Last time I checked, their sales were down nearly 10%, and their competitors were making huge gains.
Oh, and let’s not
forget about Tiger Woods. It’s been exactly now a couple of years since his scandal, and the
public hasn't viewed the athlete the same ever since. Thanks to the negative
publicity, Tiger Woods lost numerous sponsors, including Accenture and
AT&T. You think he enjoyed the negative media attention? You think Tiger
feels there’s no such thing as bad publicity?
Somehow, I doubt it.
I could go on and on
with examples of how bad publicity has hurt brands of all sizes, but I think
you’re starting to get the point. The truth is there is such a thing as bad
publicity. And while all of the brands I mentioned can and likely will
eventually recover, the bad publicity they've received has done some serious
damage for at least the short term and maybe longer.
What do you think? Do
you believe that all publicity is good publicity? Why or why not?
Please comment in linked in.
Please comment in linked in.
Thank you, great article, and I totally agree Tomas.
ReplyDeleteOgelvy was very true in his thrives to get us all to understand to be seen in the media chaos of today. But therer are good means and poore means for sure. The brillians of the future branding is to be seen and stand out with respect within the media chaos. It can be done, and that will turn to genuine success.